sat的考试真题答案_sat真题合集
sat的考试真题答案_sat真题合集
下面,我将用我自己的方式来解释sat的考试真题答案的问题,希望我的回答能够对大家有所帮助。让我们开始讨论一下sat的考试真题答案的话题。
文章目录列表:
1.几道SAT语法题不懂~ 10.9考试啦2.一道SAT填空题
3.SAT数学的两种题型有哪些
4.如何应对SAT填空题中一词多义现象
5.SAT作文题目的各种问法,急

几道SAT语法题不懂~ 10.9考试啦
1. 用 need not 出自以下几个方面的原因:
1) 表示“建议”的 suggest 后的宾语从句要求用虚拟语气 (should + 动词原形——should 可以省去,直接用动词原形)
2) 这里的 need 是情态动词,而情态动词是没有人称变化的。
3) 如果把 need 用作实意动词,需要改为 (should)not need to limit。
关于 need 的用法
1)实意动词:后面只能跟动词不定式,即 need to do,具体用法如下:
肯定 —— need to do sth.
否定 —— don't/doesn't need to do sth.
疑问 —— Do /does... need to do sth.?
2) 情态动词:只用于否定、疑问和条件从句,具体用法如下:
否定 —— need not do sth./ needn't do sth.
疑问 —— Need ... do sth.?
条件从句 —— If ... need do sth.
2. The Roman poet Virgil is highly esteemed today for his epic poem, The Aeneid, yet on his deathbed he himself sought to prevent its publication on the grounds (of not being) sufficiently polished.
句子的意思是“罗马诗人维吉尔由于他的史诗《埃涅伊德》在当代被高度评价,然而,他本人在临终只是曾以没有(被别人)充分润色为由而设法阻止这部诗歌的出版。”
从翻译可以看出,本来润色是由维吉尔去做的,但是此处却成了别人做的,因此不应该用动名词的被动语态,而应该改为主动:on the grounds of not making it sufficiently polished.
其中——
on the grounds of doing sth. 表示“以...为理由”
make sth. polished 使得某物精炼
如果把后半句改动如下即可一目了然:
he himself sought to prevent its publication on the grounds that he had not make it sufficiently polished.(it 指代 publication,用作宾语;sufficiently polished 是过去分词作宾语补足语)。
3. A thick growth of sunflowers stood ten feet tall, their brown heads drooping over the fence with the weight of their seeds.
1) A thick growth of sunflowers stood ten feet tall 是本句的主题,意思是“向日葵的茁壮生长都足有十英尺高”。
2)their brown heads drooping over the fence with the weight of their seeds. 是独立主格结构作陪衬形状语,意思是“带着果实的重量,褐色的花头一直下垂到篱笆上”。
这个句子只能意译,不然就会成了不合汉语习惯的句子:
向日葵茁壮地生长,每一株都足有十英尺高,那褐色的花冠由于果实的重量而一直低垂到篱笆上。
一道SAT填空题
。。哇。。这单词 我都只能勉强认识,,,
A 接近
B 兼容,协调
C 充足
d 。。应该是巧计的意思
e 顽固,顽抗
这个题干的意思是passengers 体会到了 一种亲近(intimacy),这种亲近是其他一般度假者花了几天时间在一起所体验不到的。然后接了个定语从句,intimacy,that。。。。。
接着看。。。有个than对吧 前后的比较
再看,community of taste 喜好的一致 ,
我查了下。。。proximity 指的是 心理学上的接近 intimacy 指的是情感,这个心理学上的接近比喜好的一致更加能导致这种intimacy 其他的选项cde肯定不对,compatibility这个词更多的值兼容相容,感觉没有proximity合适。。
SAT数学的两种题型有哪些
SAT数学题型有两种,分别是选择题和填空题。对于这两种考试题型,大家在答题的时候,需要采用不同的答题策略和方法。下面天道小编就为大家介绍一下详细的内容,供大家参考和借鉴。
SAT数学考试共44道选择题和10道填空题,分配在70分钟的时间内。
1. 选择题。
顾名思义,从题目下方的A,B,C,D,E 5个选项中选择正确的答案。
注意:只可能有一个正确答案,如果你无法得出5个所给选项中的任何一个答案,赶快停下来重新读题,重新做。不要以为这和国内部分考题一样会出现没有答案的现象而自己把自己的答案额外写出来。SAT数学词汇以及SAT数学公式的重要性大家一定很清楚了,大家需要每天积累。
选择题要试着合理地排除答案,比如你很确定结果上一正数,那么把负数答案全部画掉。用类似的方法排除到剩余1~3个答案,再合理的猜测(平时练习一定要这样做,看看你是否适合“猜”答案,如果从来都没正确过,考试的时候千万不要用这样的方法;如果你蒙功比较好,考试的时候你可以猜一下实在做不出来的题目),请记住,选择题错一个扣0.25分,不要盲目地猜。如果考试的时候你的计算结果没有出现/出现多个在5个选项中,赶快停止计算,重新读题目,重新列式计算。
2.填空题。
就是要求考生将答案写在答题纸上,并在所写的数字下面涂上实心的圈圈。
一定要认真读清题目,算出答案后考虑一下它的合理性。填空题的答题框上有让你书写答案的地方,但是这个地方在评分时不被读取,只有下面涂的圈圈才算分。所以,就算你的空填对了,圈圈涂错了,同样没有分。不要以为电脑可以感应你写的字,期盼谁可以通融你涂错的题。
填空题如果错了,不扣分。
以上内容给考生详细介绍了SAT数学有哪些主要题型,希望对考生有帮助。
如何应对SAT填空题中一词多义现象
SAT
填空题中常见的多义词
SAT
词汇量浩瀚如星海,如何在茫茫词海中找到领航的方向
面对纷繁复杂的题型,如
何定位题目,
把握要领,
也成了考生们共同的心愿。
笔者在此特别针对填空题中的时常会出
现得“陷阱题”
,即“熟词僻义”部分,根据历年真题谈谈应对策略,并总结一些常见的多
义词。
同学们且看
2012
年
10
月的
SAT
考试真题,
When
elected
director
general
of
the
World
Health
Organization,
Dr.
Margaret
Chan promised to work____, to be unflagging in her efforts to produce results.
A. vaingloriously
B. complacently
C. indefatigably
D. Ineffectually
E. Circumspectly
根据题干中的句型结构,
我们得知填空中要填的词即为逗号后
to
be
unflagging
in
her
effor
ts to produce results
的意思,再简化些,也就是要填
unflagging
的同义词,那么
unflagging
为什么意思呢
大家都知道
flag
是旗子的意思,
难道
flag
作动词是升旗的意思
吗
这样想的话也就陷入了误区——须知
flag
作动词实为
“衰退,
低落”
的意思,
和
“升旗”
则没什么关系,
unflagging
则可以推得为“不衰落,不屈不挠”
(persistent)
之意。这样
以来,选项中符合的也只有
C (indefatigably)
了。
这样的例子不胜枚举,我们再看
2011
年
10
月的真题:
While the movie employs stock characterizations, admirers argue that it is
___even if its depictions are____.
A. Maladroit
proficient
B. Stimulating
.controversial
C. Soporific
.abstruse
D. Compelling
formulaic
E. Dismal
maudlin
这一题要提醒考生的是,黑体字
stock
在此并不是股票,期货,或者是储存的意思了,
它作形容词则表示普通的,
陈旧的意思。
题干中第二个空应该是
stock
的重复,
眼尖的同学
一眼就会发现
formulaic (
公式化的,陈旧的
)
即符合。表示“陈旧”的意群在考试中也是
重点,例如
clich
é
, platitude, trite, banal, hackneyed, threadbare, pedestrian,
commonplace,
stereotyped,
timeworn/shopworn
等等,都要牢记。
顺便一提,
formulaic
旁边的
compelling
在此也不解释为强迫的,而是“引人注目”的意思。
2010
年
5
月
—
Like cartoonists, some painters seek to communicate character___, but this
economy of means is not artistic shallowness.
—
A. precociously
—
B. ludicrously
—
C. Sinuously
—
D. mercilessly
—
E. succinctly
这题中有个关键的指代
this,
指代后的
economy
即为逗号前面空格应填的意思。而
economy
在此解释为经济学则不合理了,
应为
“节省,
简洁”
与之对应的便是
E
(succinctly
SAT作文题目的各种问法,急
SAT作文的分类,所有真题
Individuality
--Following the Crowd
Do people need to compare themselves with others in order to appreciate what they have?
Are widely held views often wrong, or are such views more likely to be correct?
Is there any value for people to belong only to a group or groups with which they have something in common?
Is it always best to determine one's own views of right and wrong, or can we benefit from following the crowd?
Is it more valuable for people to fit in than to be unique and different?
Are people more likely to be productive and successful when they ignore the opinions of others?
--Following Authority
Should we pay more attention to people who are older and more experienced than we are?
Should society limit people's exposure to some kinds of information or forms of expression?
Can a group of people function effectively without someone being in charge?
Is it important to question the ideas and decisions of people in positions of authority?
Should society limit people's exposure to some kinds of information or forms of expression?
Is education primarily the result of influences other than school?
Should schools help students understand moral choices and social issues?
--Following Creativity
Is it always better to be original than to imitate or use the ideas of others?
Is it better for a society when people act as individuals rather than copying the ideas and opinions of others?
Is creativity needed more than ever in the world today?
Can people ever be truly original?
Do we put too much value on the ideas or actions of individual people?
Does planning interfere with creativity?
Motivation and Success
--Hardship and Success
Do people truly benefit from hardship and misfortune?
Do we really benefit from every event or experience in some way?
Do people place too much emphasis on winning?
Do people learn more from losing than from winning?
Does true learning only occur when we experience difficulties?
Does being ethical make it hard to be successful?
Can knowledge be a burden rather than a benefit?
Is persistence more important than ability in determining a person's success?
Is the effort involved in pursuing any goal valuable, even if the goal is not reached?
--Self-Determination and Success
Is identity something people are born with or given, or is it something people create for themselves?
Is it best for people to accept who they are and what they have, or should people always strive to better themselves?
Do success and happiness depend on the choices people make rather than on factors beyond their control?
Are people more likely to be happy if they focus on goals other than their own happiness?
Is it more important to do work that one finds fulfilling or work that pays well?
--Self-Expectation and Success
Do highly accomplished people achieve more than others mainly because they expect more of themselves?
Can people achieve success only if they aim to be perfect?
Is it best to have low expectations and to set goals we are sure of achieving?
--Collaboration and Success
Is it necessary for people to combine their efforts with those of others in order to be most effective?
Are organizations or groups most successful when their members pursue individual wishes and goals?
Do people achieve more success by cooperation than by competition?
--Ethics and Success
Does fame bring happiness, or are people who are not famous more likely to be happy?
Are people's actions motivated primarily by a desire for power over others?
--Quality or Quantity and Success
Do people achieve greatness only by finding out what they are especially good at and developing that attribute above all else?
Are all important discoveries the result of focusing on one subject?
Technological “Progress”
Does a strong commitment to technological progress cause a society to neglect other values, such as education and the protection of the environment?
Are there benefits to be gained from avoiding the use of modern technology, even when using it would make life easier?
Has today's abundance of information only made it more difficult for us to understand the world around us?
Is the most important purpose of technology today different from what it was in the past?
Have modern advancements truly improved the quality of people's lives?
Do newspapers, magazines, television, radio, movies, the Internet, and other media determine what is important to most people?
Should modern society be criticized for being materialistic?
Heroes
Do we benefit from learning about the flaws of people we admire and respect?
Should we limit our use of the term "courage" to acts in which people risk their own well-being for the sake of others or to uphold a value?
Should we admire heroes but not celebrities?
Is there a value in celebrating certain individuals as heroes?
Tradition
Do all established traditions deserve to remain in existence?
Do people need to "unlearn," or reject, many of their assumptions and ideas?
Should people always prefer new things, ideas, or values to those of the past?
Do incidents from the past continue to influence the present?
Do memories hinder or help people in their effort to learn from the past and succeed in the present?
Is it always necessary to find new solutions to problems?
Loyalty
Should people always be loyal?
Do circumstances determine whether or not we should tell the truth?
Can deception—pretending that something is true when it is not—sometimes have good results?
Is it sometimes necessary to be impolite?
Is acting an essential part of everyday life?
Others (less clearly defined; separated by spaces)
Is compromise always the best way to resolve a conflict?
Should people choose one of two opposing sides of an issue, or is the truth usually found "in the middle"?
Is the main value of the arts to teach us about the world around us?
Can books and stories about characters and events that are not real teach us anything useful?
Can common sense be trusted and accepted, or should it be questioned?
Do people put too much emphasis on learning practical skills?
Should people take more responsibility for solving problems that affect their communities or the nation in general?
Should people let their feelings guide them when they make important decisions?
Can people have too much enthusiasm?
Do images and impressions have too much of an effect on people?
Are decisions made quickly just as good as decisions made slowly and carefully?
Should people change their decisions when circumstances change, or is it best for them to stick with their original decisions?
Is it better to change one's attitude than to change one's circumstances?
Is criticism—judging or finding fault with the ideas and actions of others—essential for personal well-being and social progress?
Does having a large number of options to choose from make people happy?
我还有我自己分的,如果你要的话用百度Hi我~O(∩_∩)O~
好了,今天我们就此结束对“sat的考试真题答案”的讲解。希望您已经对这个主题有了更深入的认识和理解。如果您有任何问题或需要进一步的信息,请随时告诉我,我将竭诚为您服务。

请添加微信号咨询:19071507959
最新更新
推荐阅读
猜你喜欢
关注我们

留学规划
留学考试
留学指南
留学攻略
留学生活
留学信息
留学专业
留学签证
关于我们
网站首页







